Saturday, May 17, 2014

Paul's Definition of True Israel


Another issue that divides Baptists and Presyterians and their end-times views the definition of a true Jew, or what people make up true Israel.  There are ethnic Jews and Spiritual Jews in Scripture.  But which group gets which promises?

Before I get started though, I totally Amen what Paul says about ethnic Israel in Romans 11. They were God's original people, first to receive the Covenant Promises, and first to be loved just because God loved them.  Even though now they are temporarily blinded as punishment for their final Covenant breaking, God will not permanantly forsake them.  Even now, as always, God is saving a remnant of Jews through missions and the preaching of the Gospel, and many Jews have put their faith in the Messiah.  And finally as Paul preaches, there will be a great revival when the ones who rejected and pierced Christ their King will bow down, repent, and be gloriously reconciled to the one they so terribly rejected.

So, back to the argument.  Paul states, "For they are not all Israel who are of Israel, nor are they all children because they are the seed of Abraham." He continues, "That is, those who are the children of the flesh (i.e. ethnic Jews only), these are not the children of God; but the children of the promise (i.e. believers) are counted as the seed.

Who will inherit the promises of God? All Jews? Paul says no. Only those counted as true children.

Who are Abrahams true Children? Galatians 3:29, "If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs accordingm to the promise." If you're faith is in Christ, you are a True Israelite, and YOU will inherit the promises  if God to Israel. Gentiles we're never Plan B. In Hosea we read, "I will call them My people, who were not My people...".

There are ethnic circumcised Jews who are not true Israel, and there are uncircumcised Gentiles who are true Israel.  Saved Gentiles are not second class believers in the promises of God.

There are not two plans for two people, but only one.  It's bears repeating Galatians 3:29, "If you belong to Christ, then you are Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise." 


Friday, May 16, 2014

Baptist vs Presbyterian Covenant Members


One of the major differences between Baptist and Presbyterians, and one of the   issues that divide the two on infant baptism, is the issue of who makes up the Covenant community, or  what type of people is the New Covenant (Church) people made up of?  

It can be explained mostly by the following two statements (for the most part):

Baptists believe the Elect and Covenant Members (baptized Church Members) are the same set of people.

Presbyterians beleive that the Elect and Covenant members are not identical sets of people (Invisible vs Visible Church).

Looking at the Old Covenant Jewish community, it was made up of Covenant members (who were members in every way) that were not believers. "Moreover, brethren, I do not want you to be unaware that all our fathers were under the cloud, all passed through the sea, all were baptized into Moses in the cloud and in the sea, all ate the same spiritual food, and all drank the same spiritual drink. For they drank of that spiritual Rock that followed them, and that Rock was Christ. But with most of them God was not well pleased, for their bodies were scattered in the wilderness." I Corinthians 10:1-5

They were obvious members of the Covenant Community ("OT Church"), circumcised, baptized into Moses, and partakers of every physical and spiritual blessing.  But if we keep reading they lusted, complained, committed sexual immorality, thus tempting God.  What happened to these members?  The NKJV uses very harsh words when it says "they were destroyed".

Is it a surprise that sinners were punished? No.  What is shocking is that they were part of God's visibly chosen people.  There were blessed unbelievers in the OT Church.

Does the same hold true in the NT Church and the New Covenant?  Does the author of Hebrews ever tell us to "not be like them or suffer a similar fate?

If we wait until someone "makes a profession or decision", and then baptize them into the New Covenant Community does it guarantee that they're saved, or can they also fall into unbelief like those Jews and face a scary fate and prove they never really had faith?

Can New Covenant members "fall away" in a similar way to Old Covenant members? 

The author of Hebrews says yes, and we'll look at that next.



Friday, May 2, 2014

Where Premillennialism gets off track.

One of the fundamental misunderstandings of Premillennialism is that Christ was bringing his Kingdom to set it up here Earth, however the Jews rejected it causing Christ to withdraw the initiation of his earthly kingdom and postpone it until later.

Dr. Kim Riddlebarger is right when he states, "According to Dispensationalists, the kingdom of God was offered to Israel by Jesus himself, and when that offer was rejected, the kingdom was then withdrawn and postponed until Christ’s second advent. This understanding of the kingdom of God does not fit at all with the presentation in the Gospels of the ministry and teaching of Jesus. Indeed, it does great harm to it.” -"Case for Amillennialism".  He continues by saying, "..the present dispensation (according to Dispensationalists) results from humanity’s ability to frustrate God’s redemptive-historical purposes.”

God's plans have never been frustrated nor will they ever will be, or he wouldn't be God.  Jesus sits right now as King at the right hand of the Father.  "This Jesus God has raised up, of which we are all witnesses. Therefore being exalted to the right hand of God, and having received from the Father the promise of the Holy Spirit, He poured out this which you now see and hear." -Acts 2:32-33


In Favor of Amillennialism

Another subject I plan to tackle on here is the sticky subject of Eschatology, which is a big word for the study of the End Times, or Last Things.  Raised in a deeply Premillennial Dispensational Church, I have since left that particular view after doing what my Dad (the pastor of that Church) recommended I always do...take Scripture at face value, and only believe what it plainly says.

That study, to Give A Reason for what I believe, has led to me embracing Amillennialism, or "Realized-millennialism" as what Scripture most plainly teaches.  Jesus' Kingdom has not been postponed till a later time, it has already begun, though not yet fully realized.  

On this blog I will flush that journey out, and I hope that the reader will also un-complicate any Biblical details and systems that they have built their End Times views on, and will take Scripture for what it says, namely that when Christ comes back, and the End comes, it will be dramatic and sudden. Period.